Current:Home > InvestAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Wealthify
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-13 09:10:27
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (22335)
Related
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Ukrainian war veterans with amputated limbs find freedom in the practice of jiu-jitsu
- Off-duty Los Angeles police officer, passenger killed by suspected drunken driver, authorities say
- CB Xavien Howard and LT Terron Armstead active for Dolphins against Chiefs in Germany
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Sheryl Crow's Sons Look All Grown Up During Rare Red Carpet Outing With Mom
- Defeat of Florida increases buyout of Arkansas coach Sam Pittman by more than $5 million
- Maine mass shooter was alive for most of massive 2-day search, autopsy suggests
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Kourtney Kardashian, Travis Barker welcome a baby boy, their 1st child together
Ranking
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Victims of abusive Native American boarding schools to share experiences in Montana
- Trump State Department official Federico Klein sentenced to nearly 6 years in prison for assault on Capitol
- Deion Sanders explains staff shakeup after loss to Oregon State: `We just needed change'
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Tola sets NYC Marathon course record to win men’s race; Hellen Obiri of Kenya takes women’s title
- Record-breaking Storm Ciarán kills at least 5 in Italy, trapping residents and overturning cars: A wave of water bombs
- AP Top 25 Takeaways: Separation weekend in Big 12, SEC becomes survive-and-advance day around nation
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
How Damar Hamlin's Perspective on Life Has Changed On and Off the Field After Cardiac Arrest
Trump’s decades of testimony provide some clues about how he’ll fight for his real estate empire
Israel tightens encirclement of Gaza City as Blinken urges more civilian protection — or else there will be no partners for peace
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Maine considers electrifying proposal that would give the boot to corporate electric utilities
Afghan farmers lose income of more than $1 billion after the Taliban banned poppy cultivation
Mississippi has a history of voter suppression. Many see signs of change as Black voters reengage