Current:Home > ScamsCould claiming Social Security early increase your lifetime benefit? -Wealthify
Could claiming Social Security early increase your lifetime benefit?
View
Date:2025-04-14 10:53:52
More than 393,000 62-year-olds applied for Social Security in 2022, the most recent year data is available for. Many more are likely to join their ranks in the coming years, as 62 remains the most popular age to apply for checks. But only time will tell if they're making a good call.
Claiming Social Security early gives you more checks, but each one is smaller. This move costs most people thousands of dollars over their lifetimes. However, there are some who make out better by claiming early. The right move for you depends on two key factors.
When is early claiming a good idea?
Early claiming is applying for Social Security benefits under your full retirement age (FRA). This varies by person, depending on your birth year. For most workers today, the FRA is 67, though some older workers may have an FRA as low as 66.
Applying for benefits under your FRA shrinks your checks by 5/12 of 1% to 5/9 of 1% per month. That could cost you 5% to 6.67% for a whole year of early claiming. But a lower monthly benefit doesn't always lead to a lower lifetime benefit.
It all depends on two key factors:
- Your financial situation
- Your life expectancy
Some people have to claim Social Security early because they're not able to work and lack personal savings to pay their bills. Their monthly benefit is a lifeline that helps them maintain their financial security. For these individuals, delaying Social Security is a poor choice, even if it could lead to larger checks or a larger lifetime benefit. It's not worth the financial strain it would cause in the present.
Having a job or personal savings to cover some of your retirement expenses gives you latitude to choose the claiming age that makes sense based on your life expectancy. Generally, those with short life expectancies — people who don't expect to live past their mid-to-late 70s — get more money overall from claiming earlier. But this isn't true for those with longer life expectancies.
Let's say you qualify for a $2,000 monthly benefit at your FRA of 67. You'd get 70%, or $1,400 per month, by claiming right away at 62. The following table shows your lifetime benefit for both claiming ages based on life expectancy. The figures represent how much you would have received in total by the end of that year (i.e. you'd have $16,800 if you claimed Social Security for the entire year you were 62):
Based on this, we can see that if you expected to live no longer than 77, you'd get more money from Social Security overall by claiming at 62. But if you think you'll live longer, you'd get more money by delaying benefits until 67. And if we were to continue the table, we'd see the benefit gap between the two claiming ages grow exponentially wider.
When should you claim Social Security?
You can follow a similar process to what we did above to determine which claiming age makes the most sense to you. First, if you believe you'd be unable to afford your bills without Social Security, early claiming is likely your best bet. When that's not a factor, use estimates of your life expectancy and benefit checks to determine which claiming age will net you the most overall.
Life expectancy will be up to you to estimate based on your personal and family health history. You could try a life expectancy calculator or consult a doctor if you want a more objective opinion.
Then create a my Social Security account and check out the calculator there to estimate your future benefit at every claiming age. You may notice that it gives you estimates ranging from 62 to 70. That's because you can delay Social Security beyond your FRA to grow your checks further. Your benefits will increase by 2/3 of 1% per month, or 8% per year, beyond your FRA until you reach your maximum benefit at 70.
The calculator here gives estimates based on your income history to date. You can change this if you'd like by entering your estimated future income in the calculator. It will adjust its predictions accordingly.
Choose a few claiming ages you're interested in and multiply their monthly benefits by 12 to get your estimated annual benefits at each age. Then fill out a table like the one above and see which could pay you the most money overall based on your estimated life expectancy.
Whenever possible, choose the claiming age you believe will give you the largest lifetime benefit. But remember, you may have to repeat this process over the years if your health takes a turn or the government changes how it calculates Social Security benefits.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (1563)
Related
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- RHONY's Bethenny Frankel and Jill Zarin Have Epic Reunion 13 Years After Feud
- Global Warming Fueled Both the Ongoing Floods and the Drought That Preceded Them in Italy’s Emilia-Romagna Region
- Halle Bailey Supports Rachel Zegler Amid Criticism Over Snow White Casting
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Plastic Recycling Plant Could Send Toxic ‘Forever Chemicals’ Into the Susquehanna River, Polluting a Vital Drinking Water Source
- As the Harms of Hydropower Dams Become Clearer, Some Activists Ask, ‘Is It Time to Remove Them?’
- Fossil Fuel Companies Should Pay Trillions in ‘Climate Reparations,’ New Study Argues
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Cities Stand to Win Big With the Inflation Reduction Act. How Do They Turn This Opportunity Into Results?
Ranking
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Yellowstone’s Cole Hauser & Wife Cynthia Daniel Share Glimpse Inside Family Life With Their 3 Kids
- Ohio Environmentalists, Oil Companies Battle State Over Dumping of Fracking Wastewater
- The EPA’s New ‘Technical Assistance Centers’ Are a Big Deal for Environmental Justice. Here’s Why
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Why Kate Winslet Absolutely Roasted Robert Downey Jr. After His Failed The Holiday Audition
- New Research Shows Global Climate Benefits Of Protecting Nature, but It’s Not a Silver Bullet
- Bebe Rexha Shares Alleged Text From Boyfriend Keyan Safyari Commenting on Her Weight
Recommendation
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
Save 41% On Philosophy Dry Shampoo and Add Volume and Softness to Your Hair
Q&A: Kate Beaton Describes the Toll Taken by Alberta’s Oil Sands on Wildlife and the Workers Who Mine the Viscous Crude
Fossil Fuel Companies Should Pay Trillions in ‘Climate Reparations,’ New Study Argues
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
invisaWear Smart Jewelry and Accessories Are Making Safety Devices Stylish
Cleveland’s Tree Canopy Is in Trouble
Climate Activists Protest the Museum of Modern Art’s Fossil Fuel Donors Outside Its Biggest Fundraising Gala